PRINT .pdf version

Research Results

Wheat

INTRODUCTION

Production of soft red winter wheat with conservation tillage in South Carolina has increased from about 5% of the planted acres in 1998 to over 20% in 2000. This increase in acreage has primarily been due to farmers wanting to increase the organic matter content of their soils and to the increased popularity of winged deep-tillage devices for conservation-tillage systems. The main benefits of conservation tillage for summer crops include increased soil water infiltration and lower soil temperatures. However, problems due to drought stress are usually less severe with winter crops than summer crops in this region, and soil temperatures during the fall and winter may be below optimum even with conventional tillage. Low soil temperatures can reduce wheat seedling emergence, early season growth, the final number of tillers (stems) produced per plant, and consequently, final grain yield.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the winter wheat production practices most suitable for conservation tillage systems.

APPROACH

In 1993, we began examining different management practices in an effort to optimize conservation tillage for winter wheat production on the southeastern Coastal Plain. Treatments that have been or are currently being evaluated include surface tillage, deep tillage, soil type, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertility. For most of these research studies, conservation tillage was compared to conventional tillage centered on disking the soil surface. No surface tillage was used for the conservation tillage treatment. When appropriate, the soil was deep tilled using a ParaTill.

RESULTS

In our initial studies, we found winter wheat grain yields to be similar for conservation and conventional tillage systems (Table 1). Deep tillage to disrupt soil hardpan layers was essential for both conservation and conventional tillage (Tables 1 and 2). Fewer wheat seedlings emerged with conservation tillage than with conventional tillage (Table 1). However, the plants grown with conservation tillage produced more tillers per plant to compensate for the fewer number of plants, resulting in the similar yields for the two tillage systems. In subsequent experiments, we consistently found fewer tillers and lower (usually about 10%) grain yields with conservation tillage (Table 2). With deep tillage, grain yields within each surface tillage treatment were similar for the different soil types tested. Grain yields were lower without deep tillage than with deep tillage for all soil types except for the relatively wet Rains sandy loam soil where yields were similar or higher without deep tillage. Crop rotation increased average grain yield by more than a third and reduced the yield loss associated with conservation tillage (Table 3).

In a recent study with conservation-tillage wheat, deep tillage reduced the number of plants that emerged but the timing (before versus after planting) and direction (parallel versus at an angle to the crop rows) of deep tillage had little effect (Table 4). Similar deep-tillage responses were found for grain yield (Table 5). Increasing the amount of fall N fertilizer resulted in fewer plants per yd2 (Table 4) but an increase in grain yield (Table 5). Wheat grown with the high fall N rate also had more tillers per plant and tillers per yd2 than the wheat grown with the low N rate (data not shown), which contributed to the higher grain yield of the wheat grown with the high fall N rate.

 

Table 1. Soft red winter wheat grain yield and plant number as a function of surface and deep tillage.
Surface Tillage   Deep Tillage  
Grain Yield
Plant Number
1994
1995
1996
Avg
1994
1995
Avg
Bushels/Acre
no./yd2
Disked No
59
40
34
37
240
245
243
Disked Yes
67
53
43
48
223
238
230
  
None No
54
47
32
40
167
226
196
None Yes
67
67
40
51
174
228
201
Source: Frederick and Bauer, 1996. Agronomy Journal 88: 829-833

 

Table 2. Soft red winter wheat grain yield as a function of surface and deep tillage when grown on different soil types. Numbers shown are averages for 1997 through 2001.
Soil Type

Disked, Deep Till

Disked, No Deep Till No Till, Deep Till No Till, No Deep Till
Grain Yield, Bushels/Acre
Rains Sandy Loam
40
42
31
42
Goldsboro Loamy Sand
35
30
36
24
Nobocco Loamy Sand
39
30
37
24
Norfolk Loamy Sand
41
31
35
25
Bonneau Sand
38
25
36
26
LSD(0.05) = 5 Treatment and soil type effects significant at 0.05 probability level. Source: Frederick, Bauer, Busscher, and McCutcheon, 2001, unpublished data.

 

Table 3. Soft red winter wheat grain yield as a function of surface tillage, deep tillage, and crop rotation.
Surface Tillage
Deep Tillage
Rotation
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Avg.
Grain Yield (Bushels/Acre)
Disked
Yes
None
63
42
33
40
21
40
Disked
No
None
51
37
22
34
11
31
No Till
Yes
None
60
39
26
36
19
36
No Till
No
None
46
27
19
29
7
26
Disked
Yes
Corn
63
--
41
--
30
--
No Till
Yes
Corn
58
--
41
--
25
--
Source: Frederick, Bauer, and Busscher, 2001, unpublished data.

 

Table 4. Plant number per yd2 measured 1 month after planting.

Surface Tillage

Deep Tillage

Tillage Direction

Fall N

2000
2001
No/yd2
NST
Before
Parrallel
30
307
310
NST
Before
Across
30
308
313
NST
After
Parrallel
30
290
260
NST
After
Across
30
287
281
NST
None
-----
30
320
323
NST
After
Across
60
276
258
LSD
21
31
Source: Frederick, Busscher, Bauer, S. Robinson and E. Strickland. Agronomy Journal (in review).

 

Table 5. Wheat grain yield as a function of surface tillage, deep tillage and fall N rate.

Surface Tillage

Deep Tillage

Tillage Direction

Fall N

2000
2001
Bu/Ac
NST
Before
Parrallel
30
57
50
NST
Before
Across
30
55
49
NST
After
Parrallel
30
53
52
NST
After
Across
30
59
53
NST
None
-----
30
47
44
NST
After
Across
60
72
58
LSD
4
5
Source: Frederick, Busscher, Bauer, S. Robinson and E. Strickland. Agronomy Journal (in review).

 

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits from conservation tillage on the southeastern Coastal Plain appear to be less for soft red winter wheat than for most summer crops. Wheat grain yields are usually about the same or less with conservation tillage than with conventional tillage, regardless of whether the soil is deep tilled or not. In most cases, lower yields with conservation tillage are associated with fewer emerged plants in the fall and fewer tillers (stems) per unit land area. Many Coastal Plain farmers are finding similar trends and switching back to disking the soil prior to wheat planting. Results from a recent study indicate that increasing the fall N fertility rate is one means to enhance the grain yield of wheat produced with conservation tillage and broadcast deep tillage. Our current research studies are focused on identifying additional production practices that will enhance wheat emergence and/or early season growth when conservation tillage systems are used.

 

For more information about general management practices for producing small grains in South Carolina, please visit: http://www.clemson.edu/smallgrains

For further information about this research, please contact: Dr. Jim Frederick 843-669-1912 ext. 228 email

BACK

 

 

This webpage was last updated on January 11, 2007